Page 3 of 3

Re: NEW CONTEST!!! Most annoying .sig

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:39 pm
by vinylrake
well, that does at least explain why you think your .sig is "best".

see if you can follow this logic, read it slowly step by step. Let me know when you start getting confused.

1) sigs can be good, bad or neutral
2) annoying is not good or neutral
therefore:
3) annoying is bad
therefore:
5) a) "more annoying" = "more bad"
5) b) "most annoying" = "most bad"

6) "Most Bad" = "Worst"
therefore:
7) "most annoying .sig"= "worst sig"

Conclusion:

"worst sig"(aka "Most annoying sig") can not be the same as "best sig"

Re: NEW CONTEST!!! Most annoying .sig

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:24 am
by Baron LeDant
Yes it can, this is all opinion so someones sig can be more than one thing to 2 different people.

Re: NEW CONTEST!!! Most annoying .sig

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:44 am
by vinylrake
Baron LeDant wrote:Yes it can, this is all opinion so someones sig can be more than one thing to 2 different people.
Look the contest is for "most annoying", not "best". Don't be intentionally obtuse.

Re: NEW CONTEST!!! Most annoying .sig

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:02 pm
by Baron LeDant
No need to be rude.

Have you decided on a winner yet?

Re: NEW CONTEST!!! Most annoying .sig

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:59 pm
by vinylrake
Baron LeDant wrote:No need to be rude.
I didn't say you were *naturally* obtuse, I just asked you to stop being *intentionally* obtuse. Meaning I was giving you the credit of being smart enough to understand what I was saying and deliberately choosing to respond in an obtuse way. If it wasn't deliberate and you are naturally obtuse, then I apologize - I didn't mean to insult you.