Page 1 of 1
Amber source
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 12:49 pm
by teronas
does anyone have amber source so that I can attempt to port it to x86?
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:01 pm
by TarousZars
I'm pretty sure it's long gone. Love to be proven wrong though.
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:11 pm
by teronas
I hope not. I don't think i would be able to disassemble and port it. Atleast not in any amount of time that would be reasonable.
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 2:52 pm
by Myrd
We don't have it. We've tried contacting the original author without success. Perhaps you would have better luck.
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:00 pm
by teronas
I will try to contact the author. If you have any means of contacting him, would you please PM them to me. thanks, bryan
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 2:58 am
by Oroboros
Who wrote Amber again? Vodi?
-Oro
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:30 am
by Skeetz
Isn't Tahoe the Windows equivalent of Amber? I understand that the last version was still a beta, but if the author is different, maybe you'll have better luck contacting him.
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:10 pm
by Pyro
Yes, kinda. Tahoe is the the retarded cousin of Amber. Amber can make new collections, modify existing collections, import/export bitmaps, import/export alphas, import/export color tables, set the collection's minor settings, and add hue changes to a collection.
Tahoe can open existing collections, replace/export bitmaps, replace/export color tables, and set the collection's minor settings. Tahoe can't modify a collection's key points, reg points, selection boxes, shadow placement, adjust where the actual bitmap images are placed, nor can it add new sequences. (not even delete sequences)
So if you really want to do stuff Amber does, the only option Windows users have is to use SheepShaver to emulate classic Mac OS to run Amber.