well, that does at least explain why you think your .sig is "best".
see if you can follow this logic, read it slowly step by step. Let me know when you start getting confused.
1) sigs can be good, bad or neutral
2) annoying is not good or neutral
therefore:
3) annoying is bad
therefore:
5) a) "more annoying" = "more bad"
5) b) "most annoying" = "most bad"
6) "Most Bad" = "Worst"
therefore:
7) "most annoying .sig"= "worst sig"
Conclusion:
"worst sig"(aka "Most annoying sig") can not be the same as "best sig"
NEW CONTEST!!! Most annoying .sig
- Baron LeDant
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 9:14 pm
Re: NEW CONTEST!!! Most annoying .sig
Yes it can, this is all opinion so someones sig can be more than one thing to 2 different people.
I wear a plastic ass on my bag ~ Da Cheeze
Re: NEW CONTEST!!! Most annoying .sig
Look the contest is for "most annoying", not "best". Don't be intentionally obtuse.Baron LeDant wrote:Yes it can, this is all opinion so someones sig can be more than one thing to 2 different people.
- Baron LeDant
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 9:14 pm
Re: NEW CONTEST!!! Most annoying .sig
No need to be rude.
Have you decided on a winner yet?
Have you decided on a winner yet?
I wear a plastic ass on my bag ~ Da Cheeze
Re: NEW CONTEST!!! Most annoying .sig
I didn't say you were *naturally* obtuse, I just asked you to stop being *intentionally* obtuse. Meaning I was giving you the credit of being smart enough to understand what I was saying and deliberately choosing to respond in an obtuse way. If it wasn't deliberate and you are naturally obtuse, then I apologize - I didn't mean to insult you.Baron LeDant wrote:No need to be rude.