Hate to bring this up, but I suggest an admin do something about the bizarre campaign "Artilheiro" has been upon, over at the archive. Having played Artilheiro's maps, no doubt a decent mapmaker. But this phony 5-Star stuff isn't good.
With excuses that sound like labels on ludicrous Participation Trophies, Artilheiro has swept through the archive and rated everything in sight with fake 5-Stars--- in an effort to "encourage" people. Likely never ever played any of the maps, and false ratings don't "encourage". They instead delude or misinform.
Keep it real, at all times. There ya go.
By the way, seems Artilheiro pulled his "Defend the Hill" solo, from February. Last version was 4.8, so here's a little review...
====
3.0 - Artilheiro's "Defend the Hill":
Not bad at all, if even crazy-insane gameplay. A little rough on models and design, but decent ideas and scripting that works okay, though pretty nuts for difficulty.
Love the Paisley tent, wherever it came from. Jinn?
Would rate 4.0-stars, but with Artilheiro's warfare of using phony 5-star ratings across the Tain globe...no. I mean, why "encourage" him? By the way, Defend the Dam has the wrong overhead. And the Library maps seem to be from Behind the Library. Not a big deal, though.